Make (formerly Integromat) vs n8n
Make (formerly Integromat)
n8n
WINNER
Make (formerly Integromat)
The comparison between n8n and Make (formerly Integromat) contrasts extensibility and self-hosting with managed visual w...
emoji_events
WINNER
Make (formerly Integromat)
8.60
Great
API Integration
Get Make (formerly Integromat)
open_in_new
VS
psychology AI Verdict
The comparison between n8n and Make (formerly Integromat) contrasts extensibility and self-hosting with managed visual workflow design. n8n supports custom nodes and JavaScript logic for teams that need control over their automation infrastructure. n8n is particularly useful when integrations must run on an organization's own systems. Make (formerly Integromat) offers a visual canvas for designing branching workflows, error handling, and iterative data routing. Make (formerly Integromat) makes complex business automation more approachable without requiring users to write code.
Self-hosting n8n brings infrastructure responsibilities, while Make (formerly Integromat) trades some deployment control for a managed experience. n8n remains the better specialist choice for custom deployments, but Make (formerly Integromat) is recommended overall for its visual clarity, accessibility, and reduced maintenance burden.
thumbs_up_down Pros & Cons
Make (formerly Integromat)
check_circle Pros
- Superior visual builder with an infinite canvas for complex scenarios
- Advanced error handling and routing tools accessible without coding
- Massive library of pre-built integrations and templates
- Excellent data mapping and transformation visual tools
cancel Cons
- Pricing can escalate quickly with high operation volumes
- No self-hosted option available for on-premise security requirements
- Limited extensibility compared to an open-source codebase
n8n
check_circle Pros
- True self-hosting capability for full data control and security compliance
- Fair-code licensing with a free tier and permissive usage rights
- Highly extensible architecture allowing custom node development
- Strong support for JavaScript/TypeScript for advanced data manipulation
cancel Cons
- Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
- Requires DevOps resources to maintain and scale the self-hosted instance
- Visual interface, while functional, is less polished than competitors
compare Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment Model | Cloud-only (SaaS) managed by Make | Self-hosted (Docker, npm, Kubernetes) or Cloud |
| Workflow Editor | Infinite canvas with color-coded flow paths | Node-based editor with code view options |
| Customization | Use Apps/Modules; limited external code execution | Build custom nodes and modify source code |
| Data Mapping | Visual mapping with advanced functions and aggregators | Functional but relies more on expressions |
| Logic Handling | Visual routers, filters, and iterators on the canvas | Utilizes IF/ELSE nodes and JavaScript logic |
| Community Ecosystem | Template marketplace and community forum | Open-source community contributions and documentation |
payments Pricing
Make (formerly Integromat)
Free tier available; Paid plans start at ~$9/month (Core) scaling with operations
Good Value
n8n
Free (Self-hosted Open Source) or ~$20-50/month per user (Cloud Enterprise)
Excellent Value
difference Key Differences
Make (formerly Integromat)
n8n
Make (formerly Integromat) focuses on a superior visual paradigm. Its infinite canvas allows users to map out extremely complex scenarios involving multiple apps and intricate logic paths visually, making it easier to understand and manage large-scale business processes.
Core Strength
n8n thrives on its open-source nature and code-centric flexibility. It empowers developers to write custom JavaScript functions, host the platform on their own servers for strict data compliance, and modify the source code to fit specific architectural needs.
Make (formerly Integromat) provides a managed cloud environment with robust processing capabilities, generally offering higher out-of-the-box throughput and stability for users who do not want to manage their own servers.
Performance
Performance in n8n is largely dependent on the user's infrastructure. Since it is self-hosted, users can scale resources vertically or horizontally to handle high loads, though this requires manual DevOps effort.
Make (formerly Integromat) operates on a volume-based pricing model that can become expensive as data processing needs grow, but the predictable monthly cost includes maintenance, hosting, and updates.
Value for Money
n8n offers potentially unbeatable value for money because its open-source version is free to use forever, with enterprise features requiring a paid license. The Total Cost of Ownership is low for teams with existing server infrastructure.
Make (formerly Integromat) is designed with a lower barrier to entry, allowing power users to build complex logic through intuitive drag-and-drop actions. Its visual data mapping tools are generally considered more user-friendly than those of n8n.
Ease of Use
n8n has a steeper learning curve for non-technical users. While it has a visual editor, leveraging its full power often requires coding knowledge in JavaScript or TypeScript, making it less accessible to citizen integrators.
Ideal for digital marketers, operations managers, and SMBs that need to connect numerous SaaS applications quickly and visualize complex data pipelines without managing servers.
Best For
Ideal for software developers, CTOs, and technical teams who prioritize data privacy, need custom API integrations, or want to embed automation logic directly into their own tech stack.
help When to Choose
Make (formerly Integromat)
- If you need to visualize extremely complex multi-step workflows
- If you prefer a managed service with zero server maintenance
- If you require robust error handling and data routing without coding
n8n
- If you prioritize data sovereignty and need to self-host your automation infrastructure
- If you are a developer who wants to extend the platform with custom code or nodes
- If you want to avoid escalating SaaS costs by leveraging your own server hardware
description Overview
Make (formerly Integromat)
Make is highly regarded by power users and developers for its unparalleled visual workflow builder. It operates on a scenario-based model, allowing users to map out complex, multi-step processes with incredible granularity. Its ability to handle data routing, error trapping, and iterative loops within a single visual canvas makes it superior for intricate, multi-system business logic. It excels wh...
Read more
n8n
Visual workflows are the starting point for n8n, an automation platform that connects services and moves data between them. Users arrange nodes to define triggers and subsequent actions, while code steps allow JavaScript when a task needs custom logic. This combination suits both people assembling standard integrations and developers handling more specialized API requests or data transformations....
Read more
leaderboard Similar Items
info Details
swap_horiz Compare With Another Item
Compare Make (formerly Integromat) with...
Compare n8n with...
