zoom_in Click to enlarge

Hot Coffee

▲ ▼

description Hot Coffee Overview

Hot Coffee is a 2011 American documentary directed by attorney Susan Saladoff about tort reform and restrictions on civil lawsuits. Its title refers to Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, a case frequently reduced to a joke despite the severe burns suffered by Stella Liebeck and the evidence presented at trial. Through that case and several others, the film examines corporate messaging, damages caps, mandatory arbitration, and judicial elections for viewers interested in law and public policy.

help Hot Coffee FAQ

What is Liebeck v. McDonald's, the case behind Hot Coffee?

It was the lawsuit brought by Stella Liebeck after she suffered severe burns from McDonald's coffee, and the film explains how the case was simplified into a joke. Hot Coffee is a 2011 documentary directed by attorney Susan Saladoff, not a fictional courtroom drama.

Did Stella Liebeck really suffer serious burns?

Yes. The documentary emphasizes that Liebeck suffered severe burns, a detail often left out of popular retellings of the case. Her injury is central to Saladoff's argument about how public stories can hide the facts behind a civil lawsuit.

Is Hot Coffee about tort reform?

Yes, its main subject is tort reform and restrictions placed on civil lawsuits in the United States. The Liebeck case is the entry point, but the film broadens the discussion to how legal rules affect injured people and access to courts.

Who directed Hot Coffee, and what does the title mean?

Attorney Susan Saladoff directed the 2011 film, and the title refers to the McDonald's coffee lawsuit involving Stella Liebeck. The phrase points to the gap between the popular punchline and the documented severity of her burns.

swap_horiz

Looking for Hot Coffee alternatives? Compare top competitors ranked & scored

arrow_forward