search
Get Started
search

Best IDEs For C# Programmers On Windows

Get PDF Export

We'll send the list to your email as a beautifully formatted PDF

Choosing the right Integrated Development Environment (IDE) is crucial for C# programmers working on Windows. This ranking evaluates IDEs based on their features, usability, community support, and integration capabilities. Factors such as debugging tools, code completion, and project management features were considered to ensure that developers can work efficiently and effectively. The list includes both free and paid options to cater to different needs.

inventory_2 8 items
• Admin by Admin
Best 1 Visual Studio Code
Free Plan Available

Available on Windows, macOS and Linux, Visual Studio Code is a source code editor for building software, including websites and web applications. It provides an integrated terminal and Git tools, so developers can run commands and review changes alongside their code. Extensions add language support...

2 JetBrains Rider
Free Plan Available From $149/yr or Free (with limitations)

JetBrains Rider is a powerful cross-platform IDE specifically designed for .NET development. It combines the best of ReSharper's code analysis and refactoring capabilities with a lightweight IDE experience. Rider supports multiple frameworks, including ASP.NET and Unity, and offers seamless integrat...

8.21 Great
Why this score

Cross-platform .NET support, detailed analysis, and framework integration provide strong capabilities for professional application and game development.

Scoring methodology
3 Code::Blocks
Free Plan Available

Code::Blocks is a lightweight, open-source IDE primarily targeted at C and C++ developers. It offers a customizable environment, supporting various compilers and platforms. While it may lack some of the advanced features found in commercial IDEs, it provides a solid foundation for building C and C++...

7.22 Good
Why this score

Lightweight operation, compiler choice, and customization provide solid foundational development tools, despite fewer advanced capabilities than commercial alternatives.

Scoring methodology
4 MonoDevelop
Free Plan Available

MonoDevelop is an open-source IDE designed for cross-platform C# and .NET development. It provides a user-friendly interface and supports various programming languages. Key features include project templates, debugging tools, and integration with version control systems. MonoDevelop is particularly...

5 Eclipse with Eclim
Free Plan Available

Eclipse, primarily known for Java development, can be transformed into a C# IDE using the Eclim plugin. This setup allows developers to leverage Eclipse's powerful features, such as project management and version control, while coding in C#. The flexibility of Eclipse makes it suitable for multi-lan...

6
NE
Free Plan Available

NetBeans is primarily known for Java development but can be adapted for C# programming through plugins. This open-source IDE offers a range of features, including code editing, debugging, and project management. While it may not be as robust for C# as other dedicated IDEs, its multi-language support...

5.55 Mediocre
Why this score

NetBeans has a respected Java heritage, but plugin-dependent support makes it a middling choice for development in this language.

Scoring methodology
7 SharpDevelop
Free Plan Available

SharpDevelop is an open-source IDE for C# and VB.NET that provides a lightweight alternative to more heavyweight IDEs. It includes essential features such as code completion, debugging, and a built-in forms designer. While it may lack some advanced features found in commercial products, its simplici...

8
AT
Free Plan Available

Atom is a hackable text editor that can be customized for C# development through various community packages. While it is not a full-fledged IDE, its flexibility allows developers to create a tailored coding environment. Key features include a built-in package manager, Git integration, and a customiz...

4.70 Poor
Why this score

Discontinued development and dependence on community packages outweigh its customization strengths, making it a weak choice for ongoing software projects.

Scoring methodology

Save to your list

Save your favorites and follow how their scores change over time.

Save favorites
Track changes
Compare scores

Already have an account? Sign in

Compare Items

See how they stack up against each other

Comparing
VS
Select 1 more item to compare