What powers did Brutus No. 1 fear the Constitution would give the federal government?

Brutus argued that the Necessary and Proper Clause, the taxing power, and the Supremacy Clause would let the federal government steadily absorb state authority. He believed the proposed republic was too large for representatives to remain accountable to ordinary citizens.

Who actually wrote Brutus No. 1?

The essay appeared under the pseudonym Brutus, so its authorship is not definitively proven. It is widely attributed to Robert Yates, a New York judge who had attended the Constitutional Convention.

Was Brutus No. 1 written as a response to The Federalist Papers?

Brutus No. 1 was published on October 18, 1787, before the first Federalist essay appeared later that month. Both series joined the same ratification debate, with Brutus opposing the Constitution and Publius defending it.

What did Brutus No. 1 predict about the Supreme Court?

Brutus warned that federal judges would interpret their powers broadly and face few effective checks. Later Brutus essays developed this argument more fully, anticipating controversy over judicial review and lifetime tenure.

How does Brutus No. 1 compare to competitors?

Lunoo provides objective, AI-powered comparisons. Use the comparison tool to see Brutus No. 1 side-by-side with any alternative.

zoom_in Click to enlarge

Brutus No. 1

8.68

Great

▲ ▼

description Brutus No. 1 Overview

"Brutus No. 1" is an Anti-Federalist essay published on October 18, 1787, in response to the proposed United States Constitution. Written under the pseudonym Brutus—widely believed to be New York judge Robert Yates—it argued that the new federal government would possess too much power and inevitably subvert state sovereignty. The essay specifically warned against the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Supremacy Clause, suggesting they would lead to an overbearing national authority.

It remains a foundational text for understanding the Anti-Federalist opposition to the Constitution's ratification.

help Brutus No. 1 FAQ

How good is Brutus No. 1?

Brutus No. 1 scores 8.68/10 (Great) on Lunoo, making it a well-rated option in the Pamphlet category. Seminal Anti-Federalist critique praised for prescient concerns about federal scale, judicial power, and consolidated government.

What are the best alternatives to Brutus No. 1?

See our alternatives page for Brutus No. 1 for a ranked list with scores. Top alternatives include: Resistance to Civil Government, Letter from Birmingham Jail, A Letter Concerning Toleration.

How does Brutus No. 1 compare to Resistance to Civil Government?

See our detailed comparison of Brutus No. 1 vs Resistance to Civil Government with scores, features, and an AI-powered verdict.

Is Brutus No. 1 worth it in 2026?

With a score of 8.68/10, Brutus No. 1 is highly rated in Pamphlet. See all Pamphlet ranked.

swap_horiz

Looking for Brutus No. 1 alternatives? Compare top competitors ranked & scored

arrow_forward