How does King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) compare to competitors?

Lunoo provides objective, AI-powered comparisons. Use the comparison tool to see King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) side-by-side with any alternative.

zoom_in Click to enlarge

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017)

Name: King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017)
Description: The 2017 Guy Ritchie-directed reimagining of the Arthurian legend takes a stylized, anachronistic approach starring Charlie Hunnam, but was a significant box-office disappointment for Warner Bros.

4.45

Poor

▲ ▼

description King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) Overview

The 2017 Guy Ritchie-directed reimagining of the Arthurian legend takes a stylized, anachronistic approach starring Charlie Hunnam, but was a significant box-office disappointment for Warner Bros.

help King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) FAQ

How good is King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017)?

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) scores 4.45/10 (Poor) on Lunoo, making it rated in the Adventure Film category. Stylized direction has defenders, but box-office failure, poor reviews, and incoherent franchise-building dominate consensus.

What are the best alternatives to King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017)?

See our alternatives page for King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) for a ranked list with scores. Top alternatives include: First Knight (1995), The Secret of Kells (2009), The Sword in the Stone (1963).

How does King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) compare to First Knight (1995)?

See our detailed comparison of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) vs First Knight (1995) with scores, features, and an AI-powered verdict.

Is King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) worth it in 2026?

With a score of 4.45/10, King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) is a solid option in Adventure Film. See all Adventure Film ranked.

swap_horiz

Looking for King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) alternatives? Compare top competitors ranked & scored

arrow_forward