search
Get Started
search
Climategate - Controversy
zoom_in Click to enlarge

Climategate

language

description Climategate Overview

Climategate refers to the 2009 release of private email exchanges from researchers at the University of East Anglia. These communications sparked considerable debate regarding data analysis practices and research methodologies within climate science. The controversy fueled public skepticism about established climate change models and their underlying scientific basis. It is relevant for individuals interested in understanding the complexities of scientific investigation, particularly concerning contested issues like global warming, and those studying communication and academic discourse around sensitive topics.

help Climategate FAQ

What was actually released during Climategate?

In November 2009, a large collection of emails and files taken from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit was published online. Selected phrases were then used to allege that climate researchers had manipulated evidence or obstructed scrutiny.

Did investigations find that Climategate disproved global warming?

No, multiple reviews found no evidence that the episode overturned the scientific case for human-caused climate change. Some inquiries criticized openness and responses to information requests, but they did not establish that the core temperature record had been fabricated.

What did "hide the decline" mean in the Climategate emails?

The phrase concerned the divergence between some tree-ring proxy measurements and observed temperatures after the mid-20th century. It did not refer to hiding a measured decline in modern global temperature, although the wording and presentation became a major focus of the controversy.

Why did Climategate erupt just before the Copenhagen climate summit?

The files appeared only weeks before the December 2009 COP15 conference in Copenhagen, when international attention on climate policy was unusually high. That timing amplified their political and media impact, although the identity and motive of whoever obtained the files were not conclusively established publicly.

Reviews & Comments

Write a Review

rate_review

Be the first to review

Share your thoughts with the community and help others make better decisions.

Save to your list

Save your favorites and follow how their scores change over time.

Save favorites
Get updates
Compare scores

Already have an account? Sign in

Compare Items

See how they stack up against each other

Comparing
VS
Select 1 more item to compare