search
Get Started
search
William Nordhaus - Economist
zoom_in Click to enlarge

William Nordhaus

description William Nordhaus Overview

William Nordhaus is an American economist at Yale who shared the 2018 Nobel Prize for integrating climate change into long-run macroeconomic analysis through his Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy (DICE) model.

insights Ranking position

William Nordhaus ranks #73 of 253 in the Economist ranking, behind Elhanan Helpman, ahead of Michael Kremer.

help William Nordhaus FAQ

What is the DICE model?

The DICE (Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy) model, developed by William Nordhaus, integrates economic growth, carbon emissions, the carbon cycle, climate dynamics, and climate damages into a single framework. It allows economists and policymakers to analyze the costs and benefits of different climate policies and calculate optimal emissions reduction pathways.

What did William Nordhaus win the Nobel Prize for?

Nordhaus shared the 2018 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences with Paul Romer for integrating climate change into long-run macroeconomic analysis. The Nobel committee specifically cited his work developing quantitative models that capture the interaction between economic activity, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate impacts.

What is the social cost of carbon according to Nordhaus?

Nordhaus's DICE model estimates the social cost of carbon—the economic damage caused by each additional ton of CO2 emissions—at roughly $30-40 per ton in recent versions, though estimates vary based on assumptions about damages and discount rates. This figure is used by policymakers to evaluate the benefits of emissions regulations.

What are criticisms of Nordhaus's climate-economy models?

Critics argue that the DICE model may underestimate climate damages, particularly catastrophic risks and tipping points that could cause irreversible environmental changes. Some economists and scientists contend that the model's assumptions about discount rates and damage functions lead to recommendations for relatively gradual emissions reductions that may be insufficient to prevent dangerous warming.

Reviews & Comments

Write a Review

rate_review

Be the first to review

Share your thoughts with the community and help others make better decisions.

Save to your list

Save your favorites and follow how their scores change over time.

Save favorites
Get updates
Compare scores

Already have an account? Sign in

Compare Items

See how they stack up against each other

Comparing
VS
Select 1 more item to compare