search
Get Started
search
Lawrence Kohlberg - Psychologist
zoom_in Click to enlarge

Lawrence Kohlberg

description Lawrence Kohlberg Overview

Lawrence Kohlberg was an American psychologist known for his stage theory of moral development, which extended Jean Piaget's work on children's reasoning. He proposed six stages grouped into preconventional, conventional, and postconventional levels, describing changes in how people justify moral decisions rather than which decisions they make. His research relied heavily on responses to moral dilemmas and influenced education, developmental psychology, and debates about justice and culture.

help Lawrence Kohlberg FAQ

What is Lawrence Kohlberg's stage theory of moral development?

Lawrence Kohlberg was an American psychologist known for his stage theory of moral development. He proposed that moral reasoning evolves through six distinct stages grouped into three levels: preconventional, conventional, and postconventional. His work was heavily influenced by the earlier cognitive development theories of Jean Piaget.

How did Lawrence Kohlberg measure moral development?

Kohlberg measured moral development using a series of moral dilemmas presented to his subjects. The most famous of these is the Heinz dilemma, which asks whether it is morally acceptable to steal an unaffordable drug to save a dying spouse. He evaluated the reasoning behind the answers rather than the yes/no verdict itself.

What is the postconventional level in Kohlberg's theory?

The postconventional level is the highest stage of moral development in Kohlberg's framework. At this level, individuals make moral decisions based on universal ethical principles and internalized values, even if they conflict with laws or societal rules. Kohlberg believed that many people never actually reach this final level of reasoning.

Did Kohlberg's theory of moral development face criticism?

Yes, Kohlberg's theory was heavily criticized by psychologists like Carol Gilligan. Gilligan argued that his theory exhibited a male bias by focusing heavily on justice and rules, potentially ignoring an ethic of care. This critique sparked further research into gender differences in moral reasoning.

Reviews & Comments

Write a Review

rate_review

Be the first to review

Share your thoughts with the community and help others make better decisions.

Save to your list

Save your favorites and follow how their scores change over time.

Save favorites
Track changes
Compare scores

Already have an account? Sign in

Compare Items

See how they stack up against each other

Comparing
VS
Select 1 more item to compare