search
Get Started
search
Paul Meehl - Psychologist
zoom_in Click to enlarge

Paul Meehl

description Paul Meehl Overview

Paul E. Meehl was an American clinical psychologist, philosopher of science, and professor at the University of Minnesota. His 1954 book Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction compared clinicians' judgments with formal actuarial methods and showed that statistical prediction often matched or exceeded unaided clinical assessment. His broader work addressed psychiatric classification, schizophrenia research, scientific testing, and the philosophy of psychology.

insights Ranking position

Paul Meehl ranks #16 of 228 in the Psychologist ranking, behind Jerome Bruner, ahead of Marsha Linehan.

help Paul Meehl FAQ

What did Paul Meehl mean by clinical versus statistical prediction?

Meehl contrasted unaided professional judgment with predictions produced by explicit statistical or actuarial rules. In his 1954 book Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction, he argued that mechanical methods generally matched or outperformed clinicians across the evidence he reviewed.

Did Paul Meehl believe psychologists should never use clinical judgment?

No. His argument targeted situations in which clinicians informally combined known data even though a validated statistical rule could perform that task more consistently; he still recognized roles for observation, theory, and gathering new information.

What is a Meehlian taxometric analysis?

Taxometrics is a family of methods Meehl helped develop to test whether a psychological construct is categorical or continuously distributed. Researchers have used these procedures in debates over whether conditions or traits represent distinct taxa rather than arbitrary cutoffs on dimensions.

What was Paul Meehl's connection to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory?

Meehl worked at the University of Minnesota, where the MMPI was developed, and contributed influential research on interpreting personality-test patterns. His broader work emphasized validating predictions against outcomes instead of relying only on clinicians' impressions.

Reviews & Comments

Write a Review

rate_review

Be the first to review

Share your thoughts with the community and help others make better decisions.

Save to your list

Save your favorites and follow how their scores change over time.

Save favorites
Get updates
Compare scores

Already have an account? Sign in

Compare Items

See how they stack up against each other

Comparing
VS
Select 1 more item to compare