search
Get Started
search
Fairbanks-Morse H-24-66 Train Master - Locomotive
zoom_in Click to enlarge

Fairbanks-Morse H-24-66 Train Master

description Fairbanks-Morse H-24-66 Train Master Overview

The Fairbanks-Morse H-24-66 Train Master is a six-axle diesel-electric locomotive produced by Fairbanks-Morse between 1953 and 1957. It was powered by a 2,400-horsepower opposed-piston engine, making it among the most powerful single-engine diesel locomotives available during its production period. The locomotive was marketed toward freight and passenger service but faced competition from established EMD and General Electric offerings. Approximately 127 units were built for railroads including the Southern Pacific, Pennsylvania Railroad, and Canadian Pacific.

help Fairbanks-Morse H-24-66 Train Master FAQ

How much horsepower does the Fairbanks-Morse H-24-66 Train Master produce?

The Fairbanks-Morse H-24-66 Train Master produced an impressive 2,400 horsepower, making it one of the most powerful single-engine diesel locomotives in the world at its introduction. This immense power allowed it to handle heavy freight and passenger services effortlessly.

What years was the Fairbanks-Morse Train Master manufactured?

This six-axle diesel-electric locomotive was built by Fairbanks-Morse for a brief period spanning from 1953 to 1957. The relatively short production run was due to both shifting market demands and Fairbanks-Morse's ongoing struggles to compete with rivals like EMD and ALCO.

What type of prime mover engine was used in the H-24-66 Train Master?

The locomotive was powered by Fairbanks-Morse's distinctive opposed-piston diesel engine. This unique engine design utilized two pistons per cylinder moving toward each other, which eliminated the need for a traditional cylinder head.

Which railroads purchased the Fairbanks-Morse H-24-66 Train Master?

Several major North American railroads bought the H-24-66, including the Southern Pacific, Canadian Pacific, and the Pennsylvania Railroad. Despite its immense power, operational complexities with the opposed-piston engine eventually led many railroads to retire them earlier than competing models.

Reviews & Comments

Write a Review

rate_review

Be the first to review

Share your thoughts with the community and help others make better decisions.

Save to your list

Save your favorites and follow how their scores change over time.

Save favorites
Track changes
Compare scores

Already have an account? Sign in

Compare Items

See how they stack up against each other

Comparing
VS
Select 1 more item to compare