search
Get Started
search
Rayna Rapp - Anthropologist
zoom_in Click to enlarge

Rayna Rapp

description Rayna Rapp Overview

Rayna Rapp is an American feminist and medical anthropologist whose work has significantly influenced the study of reproduction, genetics, and disability. She is best known for her ethnographic research on amniocentesis and genetic testing in the United States, which culminated in her 1999 book "Testing Women, Testing the Fetus." Her scholarship provides a critical framework for understanding how families and healthcare professionals navigate the complex social and ethical dimensions of new reproductive technologies.

help Rayna Rapp FAQ

What is Rayna Rapp's most famous book about amniocentesis?

Rayna Rapp's best-known work is "Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America," published in 1999. The book is an ethnographic study examining how women of different class, racial, and religious backgrounds in New York City navigate the experience of prenatal genetic testing.

What field of anthropology is Rayna Rapp associated with?

Rayna Rapp is a leading figure in feminist and medical anthropology, with particular influence on the anthropology of reproduction, genetics, and disability. Her ethnographic research on amniocentesis helped establish reproduction and genetic testing as a major subfield within medical anthropology.

Where does Rayna Rapp hold her academic position?

Rayna Rapp has been associated with New York University, where she served as a professor in the Department of Anthropology. She has also been affiliated with the New School for Social Research earlier in her career, contributing to the strong tradition of urban-based ethnographic research in New York.

What did Rayna Rapp discover about how women experience genetic testing?

Rapp's research showed that women's decisions around amniocentesis are deeply shaped by factors like class, race, religion, and disability, not just medical information alone. She documented how women from different backgrounds interpreted the same test results in radically different ways, highlighting the social dimensions of reproductive technology.

Reviews & Comments

Write a Review

rate_review

Be the first to review

Share your thoughts with the community and help others make better decisions.

Save to your list

Save your favorites and follow how their scores change over time.

Save favorites
Get updates
Compare scores

Already have an account? Sign in

Compare Items

See how they stack up against each other

Comparing
VS
Select 1 more item to compare